Our Verdict
Best a11y tool for design teams, embedding checks in Figma, but you still need runtime scanners on shipped code.
Pros
- Strong Figma and design-tool integration for a11y
- Shifts accessibility checks left into design phase
- Contrast, typography and focus-order checks in-editor
- Popular with design teams, good community
Cons
- Design-time focus, not runtime site monitoring
- Requires designers to adopt new workflows
- Advanced features behind higher-tier pricing
- Doesn't replace code-level WCAG testing
Best for: Design teams catching a11y issues in Figma before engineering.
Not for: Teams wanting automated scans of production web apps.
When to Use Stark
Good fit if you need
- WCAG contrast check run inside Figma before design handoff
- Figma layer vision simulator previewing color-blind experience
- Focus order annotation added to design file for developer spec
- Accessibility auto-annotation workflow triggered on component update
- Team a11y checklist embedded in Figma design review process
Lock-in Assessment
Medium 4/5
Lock-in Score 4/5
Pricing
Price wrong?Stark Pricing
- Pricing Model
- freemium
- Free Tier
- Yes
- Entry Price
- —
- Enterprise Available
- No
- Transparency Score
- —
Beta — estimates may differ from actual pricing
1,000
1001K10K100K1M
Estimated Monthly Cost
$25
Estimated Annual Cost
$300
Estimates are approximate and may not reflect current pricing. Always check the official pricing page.
Community Discussion
Comments powered by Giscus (GitHub Discussions). You need a GitHub account to comment.