RunsOn
Self-hosted GitHub Actions runners deployed in your AWS account supporting x64, ARM64, and GPU instances at 90% lower cost.
Our Verdict
The right call when GitHub-hosted Actions bills are painful and you already live on AWS.
Pros
- Drop-in GitHub Actions runners in your AWS account
- Dramatic cost savings vs GitHub-hosted runners
- Supports x64, ARM64, and GPU instances
- Ephemeral EC2, so isolation is genuine
Cons
- You inherit AWS bills and account complexity
- Runner warmup vs spot availability is your problem
- Limited to AWS, no GCP or Azure option
- Small team, commercial license
Best for: AWS-based teams with heavy CI spend on GitHub Actions wanting cheaper, bigger runners.
Not for: Teams not on AWS or unwilling to manage EC2 runners.
When to Use RunsOn
Good fit if you need
- Self-hosted GitHub Actions runners in your AWS account
- ARM64 and GPU runner support at 90% cost reduction
- Ephemeral runners with per-job VPC isolation
- Autoscaling runner fleet on EC2 Spot or On-Demand
Lock-in Assessment
Low 4/5
Lock-in Score 4/5
Pricing
Price wrong?RunsOn Pricing
- Pricing Model
- subscription
- Free Tier
- No
- Entry Price
- —
- Enterprise Available
- No
- Transparency Score
- —
Beta — estimates may differ from actual pricing
1,000
1001K10K100K1M
Estimated Monthly Cost
$25
Estimated Annual Cost
$300
Estimates are approximate and may not reflect current pricing. Always check the official pricing page.
Project Health
D
Health Score
1.2k 44
Bus Factor
1
Last Commit
5 days
Release Freq
7d
Open Issues
11
Issue Response
7d
License
MIT
Last checked: 2026-04-21
Community Discussion
Comments powered by Giscus (GitHub Discussions). You need a GitHub account to comment.