Maze
User research and testing platform for rapid prototype testing, card sorting, tree testing, surveys and usability analytics with session recordings.
Our Verdict
Strong unmoderated research platform for design teams, but miscategorized if you want production session replay.
Pros
- Runs unmoderated usability tests on live prototypes quickly
- Card sorting and tree testing native, not bolted on
- Session recordings tied to specific research tasks
- Figma and Sketch integrations streamline UX handoff
Cons
- Not a production session replay tool despite recording flows
- Participant panel recruitment can be slow in niche segments
- Advanced research features gated behind higher tiers
- Quantitative analytics limited vs dedicated analytics stacks
Best for: UX and design teams validating prototypes and usability pre-launch.
Not for: Engineering teams looking for production session replay and error triage.
When to Use Maze
Good fit if you need
- Rapid prototype usability testing with quantitative metrics
- Card sorting and tree testing for navigation design
- Unmoderated user research with session recordings
- Task success rate and misclick heatmaps for UX decisions
Lock-in Assessment
Medium 3/5
Lock-in Score 3/5
Pricing
Price wrong?Maze Pricing
- Pricing Model
- freemium
- Free Tier
- Yes
- Entry Price
- —
- Enterprise Available
- No
- Transparency Score
- —
Beta — estimates may differ from actual pricing
1,000
1001K10K100K1M
Estimated Monthly Cost
$25
Estimated Annual Cost
$300
Estimates are approximate and may not reflect current pricing. Always check the official pricing page.
Community Discussion
Comments powered by Giscus (GitHub Discussions). You need a GitHub account to comment.