Object Storage / Media API
Cloudinary and api.video both show up under the object storage media category, but they solve slightly different jobs. Cloudinary starts at $0/month; api.video starts at $12 /month. Lock-in is high for Cloudinary and medium for api.video. Transparency lands at 3/5 versus 4/5. Both tools target image/video heavy applications, so the choice comes down to pricing, lock-in, and operational fit rather than scope. Worth noting: Cloudinary is explicitly not for small projects. The honest trade-off: Cloudinary trades off on text-only applications; api.video trades off on text-only applications. On the plus side, Cloudinary highlights image/video heavy applications. Cloudinary's documentation also calls out user-generated content platforms. For teams evaluating object storage media options today, the decision usually hinges on whether Cloudinary's profile or api.video's profile maps more cleanly to the pricing model, lock-in tolerance, and scale your team can live with. Beyond the headline pitch, a documented Cloudinary use-case is "User-generated content platforms", and a documented api.video use-case is "User-generated content platforms".
Quick take
Cloudinary is for image/video heavy applications; api.video is for image/video heavy applications; decide on entry price.
 Cloudinary |  api.video | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Object Storage / Media API | Object Storage / Media API |
| Pricing Model | subscription | subscription |
| Entry Price | $0/month | $12 /month |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Billing Complexity | — | — |
| Developer Experience | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Pricing Transparency | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Lock-in Level | high | medium |
| Migration Complexity | — | — |
| Data Portability | — | — |
| Enterprise | Available | Available |
| GitHub Stars | 662 | 202 |
| License | — | MIT |
Choose Cloudinary if your project is image/video heavy applications, a subscription starting at $0/month fits your budget, you are willing to accept the high lock-in called out in our data.
Not for: Small projects
Choose api.video if your project is image/video heavy applications, a subscription starting at $12 /month fits your budget, medium lock-in is an acceptable trade-off.
Not for: Small projects
Check each tool's dedicated page for deeper reviews, setup notes, and pros/cons.
Cloudinary uses subscription from $0/month with free tier, and api.video uses subscription from $12 /month with free tier. On published entry price, Cloudinary lists $0/month while api.video lists $12 /month — but the real cost at your scale will depend on actual usage, not just the starting tier.
Our data puts Cloudinary at high lock-in (transforms and urls tightly coupled), and api.video at medium lock-in (video assets exportable but player/cdn tied). Expect real migration work out of Cloudinary — plan for data export, re-integration, and downtime testing before cutting over.
Both score 5/5 on developer experience in our data, so there's no clear winner on that axis. api.video does edge ahead on pricing/docs transparency (4/5 vs 3/5), which can make evaluation faster.
api.video covers a similar scope to Cloudinary — our data lists "Image/video heavy applications" as the best-for on both. One caveat: api.video is explicitly not for small projects, so check that constraint against your use-case before switching.
Comments powered by Giscus (GitHub Discussions). You need a GitHub account to comment.