Identity / Auth / User Management

Cerbos vs Turnkey

The clearest split between Cerbos and Turnkey is how they charge: Cerbos uses a free tier plus paid plans starting around $0/month, while Turnkey uses usage-based pricing. Cerbos is Open-source authorization service with human-readable YAML policies, RBAC/ABAC, and REST/gRPC evaluation endpoints; it fits best for Apps, B2B. Turnkey is Wallet infrastructure and key management API using secure enclaves for crypto and fintech apps; it fits best for Fintech and crypto infra teams building custom wallet UX on top. Pick Cerbos when the job maps to apps needing sso/mfa; pick Turnkey when it maps to secure enclave key management api for crypto fintech apps. Cerbos is not for internal, static projects. Turnkey is not for product teams wanting a ready-made end-user wallet sdk. Honest trade-offs: Cerbos is weak for internal tools with basic auth, and Turnkey is weak for primitive-heavy; you build ux on top yourself β€” match to your real scenario.

Quick take

Cerbos is for apps, b2b; Turnkey is for fintech and crypto infra teams building custom wallet ux on ; decide based on pricing model.

Feature comparison

Cerbos Cerbos Turnkey Turnkey
Category Identity / Auth / User Management Identity / Auth / User Management
Pricing Model freemium usage
Entry Price $0/month β€”
Free Tier Yes Yes
Billing Complexity β€” β€”
Developer Experience 5/5 4/5
Pricing Transparency 5/5 3/5
Lock-in Level low medium
Migration Complexity β€” β€”
Data Portability β€” β€”
Enterprise Available β€”
GitHub Stars 4.3k 95
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0

When to choose which

Choose Cerbos when…

Choose Cerbos if you want a free tier plus paid plans starting around $0/month and your workload matches apps, b2b.

  • Apps needing SSO/MFA
  • B2B requiring SAML/SCIM
  • Wide range of social login and MFA options

Not for: Internal, Static projects

Choose Turnkey when…

Choose Turnkey if you want usage-based pricing and your workload matches fintech and crypto infra teams building custom wallet ux on top.

  • Secure-enclave key management with policy engine
  • Non-custodial model with fine-grained permissions
  • Low-latency signing suitable for high-throughput apps
  • Good docs and programmable approvals

Not for: Product teams wanting a ready-made end-user wallet SDK

Common use cases

Cerbos

  • Apps needing SSO/MFA
  • B2B requiring SAML/SCIM
  • Passwordless authentication

Turnkey

  • Secure enclave key management API for crypto fintech apps
  • Wallet infrastructure with policy-based signing controls
  • Multi-party approval workflow for institutional asset custody
  • Embedded wallet provisioning for fintech user onboarding
  • Hardware-backed key storage for payment application signing

Ready to explore?

Check each tool's dedicated page for deeper reviews, setup notes, and pros/cons.

Frequently asked questions

Is Cerbos cheaper than Turnkey?

A direct comparison depends on your usage profile and which pricing model fits better. Cerbos has a free tier with paid plans starting at $0/month. Turnkey uses usage-based pricing.

Can I migrate from Cerbos to Turnkey?

Migration from Cerbos (low lock-in) to Turnkey (medium lock-in) is the harder direction; the reverse is easier. Plan for data export, re-integration of SDKs, and re-testing flows before cutover. Verify exportable formats and feature parity against your live use cases before committing.

Which has better developer experience?

Cerbos scores higher on developer experience (5/5 vs 4/5 for Turnkey). Evaluate against your own stack: read their docs, run a quick SDK spike, and check error handling. Self-assessing with a small prototype beats trusting any rating at face value.

Is Turnkey a good alternative to Cerbos?

Turnkey sits in the same category as Cerbos, so it can be a reasonable alternative for overlapping use cases. Turnkey is best fit for fintech and crypto infra teams building custom wallet ux on top. Note: Turnkey is not for product teams wanting a ready-made end-user wallet sdk.

Community Discussion

Comments powered by Giscus (GitHub Discussions). You need a GitHub account to comment.