Bunny.net
Low β growth CDN, Edge Rules growth
Migration difficulty: low
Data you keep: Via API
API standard: REST standard
Risk notes: Low β growth CDN, Edge Rules growth
π‘ Standard protocols make switching straightforward
CDN / Edge / Acceleration
The biggest real distinction between Bunny.net and Fastly is straightforward: Bunny.net carries low lock-in while Fastly has moderate lock-in. Bunny.net sits at usage-based pricing starting at $0.002/GB (from $1/mo), enterprise plan available and carries low lock-in, while Fastly sits at usage-based pricing starting at $50/mo (pay-as-you-go), $0.12/GB, enterprise plan available and carries moderate lock-in. Bunny.net is a fit when you need global β typical scenarios include global audience with low latency needs. Fastly is aimed at global, with workloads like global audience with low latency needs as the common case. The honest trade-off: Bunny.net is explicitly not for internal projects; Fastly is not intended for internal projects. Lock-in is the factor most teams underestimate: Bunny.net and Fastly have different exit paths, and that shapes total cost of ownership over a two-to-three year horizon. Before committing, audit where each tool stores state, which APIs you depend on, and how painful a switch would be six months in.
Quick take
Bunny.net is for global; Fastly is for global; decide based on how much lock-in you can accept.
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CDN / Edge / Acceleration | CDN / Edge / Acceleration |
| Pricing Model | usage | usage |
| Entry Price | $0.002/GB (from $1/mo) | $50/mo (pay-as-you-go), $0.12/GB |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Billing Complexity | low | medium |
| Developer Experience | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Pricing Transparency | 5/5 | 4/5 |
| Lock-in Level | low | medium |
| Migration Complexity | low | medium |
| Data Portability | Via API | Config export |
| Enterprise | Available | Available |
| GitHub Stars | β | β |
| License | β | β |
Low β growth CDN, Edge Rules growth
Migration difficulty: low
Data you keep: Via API
API standard: REST standard
Risk notes: Low β growth CDN, Edge Rules growth
π‘ Standard protocols make switching straightforward
Medium β VCL = proprietary, Compute@Edge = WASM standard
Migration difficulty: medium
Data you keep: Config export
API standard: VCL proprietary, Compute = WASM
Risk notes: Medium β VCL = proprietary, Compute@Edge = WASM standard
π‘ Moderate effort required. Export data before canceling
Choose Bunny.net if your primary workload is global and you prefer usage-based pricing (starts at $0.002/GB (from $1/mo)).
Not for: Internal projects
Choose Fastly if your primary workload is global and you prefer usage-based pricing (starts at $50/mo (pay-as-you-go), $0.12/GB).
Not for: Internal projects
Check each tool's dedicated page for deeper reviews, setup notes, and pros/cons.
It depends on workload shape: Bunny.net lists $0.002/GB (from $1/mo), while Fastly lists $50/mo (pay-as-you-go), $0.12/GB. With different pricing models (usage vs usage), the cheaper option flips based on seat count, usage volume, and whether you use the free tier. Do a per-workload estimate rather than comparing headline numbers.
Migrating from Bunny.net to Fastly is generally feasible because Bunny.net has low lock-in, so data and configuration are usually portable. Since both tools sit in the same category (CDN / Edge / Acceleration), the conceptual mapping is closer, but you still need to validate feature parity against your specific workload. Plan migration as a project, not a script: inventory integrations, test on non-production workloads, and keep Bunny.net running in parallel until Fastly is verified.
Our data gives Bunny.net and Fastly the same developer experience score (5/5), so neither has a clear edge on DX by that measure. The differentiator is usually how each tool fits your workflow β things like CLI quality, docs, local dev loop, and error messages. The safest call is to pilot both on a representative task and see which one gets out of your way.
Fastly is in the same category as Bunny.net (CDN / Edge / Acceleration), so it's a reasonable alternative to evaluate. Both tools claim similar best-fit workloads on paper, so the real test is how each behaves under your specific constraints. Note that Fastly is explicitly not for internal projects β if that describes your workload, it's not a viable replacement.
Comments powered by Giscus (GitHub Discussions). You need a GitHub account to comment.