Performance Monitoring / APM
Apache SkyWalking vs New Relic
The biggest real distinction between Apache SkyWalking and New Relic is straightforward: Apache SkyWalking carries low lock-in while New Relic has moderate lock-in. Apache SkyWalking sits at seat-based pricing and carries low lock-in, while New Relic sits at hybrid pricing with $0.30/GB (Standard), $49/core user, a free tier, enterprise plan available and carries moderate lock-in. Apache SkyWalking is a fit when you need microservices performance monitoring — typical scenarios include microservices performance monitoring. New Relic is aimed at microservices performance monitoring, with workloads like microservices performance monitoring as the common case. The honest trade-off: Apache SkyWalking is explicitly not for simple, static projects; New Relic is not intended for simple, static projects. Lock-in is the factor most teams underestimate: Apache SkyWalking and New Relic have different exit paths, and that shapes total cost of ownership over a two-to-three year horizon. Before committing, audit where each tool stores state, which APIs you depend on, and how painful a switch would be six months in.
Quick take
Apache SkyWalking is for microservices performance monitoring; New Relic is for microservices performance monitoring; decide based on how much lock-in you can accept.
Feature comparison
 Apache SkyWalking | | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Performance Monitoring / APM | Performance Monitoring / APM |
| Pricing Model | seat | hybrid |
| Entry Price | — | $0.30/GB (Standard), $49/core user |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Billing Complexity | — | medium |
| Developer Experience | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Pricing Transparency | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Lock-in Level | low | medium |
| Migration Complexity | — | medium |
| Data Portability | — | Via API, OTel-compatible |
| Enterprise | — | Available |
| GitHub Stars | 24.8k | — |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
Switching cost & lock-in
New Relic
Medium — onandinon underto OpenTelemetry, OTel-fromand
Migration difficulty: medium
Data you keep: Via API, OTel-compatible
API standard: OpenTelemetry native
Risk notes: Medium — onandinon underto OpenTelemetry, OTel-fromand
💡 Moderate effort required. Export data before canceling
When to choose which
Choose Apache SkyWalking when…
Choose Apache SkyWalking if your primary workload is microservices performance monitoring and low switching cost matters.
- Microservices performance monitoring
- Distributed tracing
- Deep integrations across the observability stack
Not for: Simple, Static projects
Choose New Relic when…
Choose New Relic if your primary workload is microservices performance monitoring and hybrid pricing ($0.30/GB (Standard), $49/core user) is acceptable.
- Microservices performance monitoring
- Distributed tracing
- Deep integrations across the observability stack
Not for: Simple, Static projects
Common use cases
Apache SkyWalking
- Microservices performance monitoring
- Distributed tracing
- Infrastructure monitoring at scale
New Relic
- Microservices performance monitoring
- Distributed tracing
- Infrastructure monitoring at scale
Ready to explore?
Check each tool's dedicated page for deeper reviews, setup notes, and pros/cons.
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache SkyWalking cheaper than New Relic?
New Relic publishes an entry price of $0.30/GB (Standard), $49/core user; Apache SkyWalking's entry price is not in our data, so a definitive comparison is not possible without a quote from Apache SkyWalking.
Can I migrate from Apache SkyWalking to New Relic?
Migrating from Apache SkyWalking to New Relic is generally feasible because Apache SkyWalking has low lock-in, so data and configuration are usually portable. Since both tools sit in the same category (Performance Monitoring / APM), the conceptual mapping is closer, but you still need to validate feature parity against your specific workload. Plan migration as a project, not a script: inventory integrations, test on non-production workloads, and keep Apache SkyWalking running in parallel until New Relic is verified.
Which has better developer experience?
On our 0–5 developer experience scale, New Relic scores higher (5/5 vs 4/5 for Apache SkyWalking). The gap is one point — meaningful but not decisive, since DX is workflow-dependent. Still, score your own tasks: DX is subjective and tied to stack assumptions.
Is New Relic a good alternative to Apache SkyWalking?
New Relic is in the same category as Apache SkyWalking (Performance Monitoring / APM), so it's a reasonable alternative to evaluate. Both tools claim similar best-fit workloads on paper, so the real test is how each behaves under your specific constraints. Note that New Relic is explicitly not for simple, static projects — if that describes your workload, it's not a viable replacement.
Community Discussion
Comments powered by Giscus (GitHub Discussions). You need a GitHub account to comment.