Mindgard logo

Mindgard

AI/LLM security testing platform (Lancaster Uni spinout).

-

Our Verdict

Promising AI/LLM security testing for forward-looking teams, but the category and product are both early.

Pros

  • Targeted specifically at LLM and AI model threats
  • Automated red teaming for prompt injection and jailbreaks
  • Academic research backing from Lancaster University
  • Covers model, data, and pipeline attack surfaces

Cons

  • Young product with limited public case studies
  • AI security category itself is still maturing
  • Pricing unclear and likely enterprise-focused
  • Coverage of proprietary model internals is limited
Best for: Enterprises deploying customer-facing LLM apps and needing dedicated AI red teaming. Not for: Teams only using third-party APIs without custom AI pipelines or model hosting.

When to Use Mindgard

Good fit if you need

  • LLM red-teaming for prompt injection vulnerability detection
  • AI model security testing for OWASP ML Top 10 risks
  • Jailbreak resistance testing before LLM production deployment
  • Adversarial robustness testing for ML model pipelines
  • AI security assessment for enterprise LLM use case review

Lock-in Assessment

Medium 3/5
Lock-in Score
3/5

Mindgard Pricing

Pricing Model
custom
Free Tier
No
Entry Price
Enterprise Available
No
Transparency Score

Beta — estimates may differ from actual pricing

1,000
1001K10K100K1M

Estimated Monthly Cost

$25

Estimated Annual Cost

$300

Estimates are approximate and may not reflect current pricing. Always check the official pricing page.

Community Discussion

Comments powered by Giscus (GitHub Discussions). You need a GitHub account to comment.